'Echowritten by Twixify' is a series of articles on random trending topics, usually about internet trends or word definitions. These articles are fully generated by ChatGPT, then fact-corrected, customized, and paraphrased using Twixify. To see how you can make ChatGPT write in your own tone of voice, check out Twixify's custom mode.
![Copyleaks Review - Pricing & Features Explained [2024]](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/65dddaaaab4f00dfc7709e91/662e0aeb7f5efa9db14d1410_Screenshot%202024-04-28%20183751.png)
I've used Copyleaks for several projects, and it's essentially a plagiarism and AI detection service. This tool helps me ensure that all the content I produce or review is unique. It's particularly handy for scanning academic papers or any web content to spot similarities that might be too close for comfort to existing material online.
From my experience, Copyleaks isn't just for educators or students. As a content creator, I find it invaluable for maintaining the originality of my work, especially in an online environment where duplicated content is a common issue. This makes it a go-to for anyone who needs to check for content originality, whether for academic, personal, or professional purposes.
I've been using Copyleaks for a while now to check the originality of my students' submissions. Here's what I've noticed about how it works. Copyleaks scans a massive database that includes websites, articles, documents, and previously submitted materials. This database is constantly updated, so it catches even the cleverly disguised content that students might submit.
After scanning, Copyleaks gives each submission a "similarity score." This score shows what percentage of the student's work matches content from the database. For me, this score is crucial because it helps me quickly see which parts of the submission might be unoriginal.
I usually run scans right after assignments are due. It's part of my routine. I check the similarity scores and then look more closely at any submissions with high scores. Copyleaks highlights the matching text, which saves me a lot of time. I can see exactly where the matches are without having to read through every word.
The reason I rely on Copyleaks is its comprehensive search capabilities. It doesn't just check against published web content; it compares with a wide variety of sources. This thorough approach means I can be confident about the originality of the work I'm grading.
Here are the 4 main features of Copyleaks AI detector.
Copyleaks offers a straightforward AI-detection interface that I find extremely user-friendly. You start on their homepage where a prominent text box is displayed. Here, I just paste the content I need to check. A single click on the “check” button—which is brightly colored and easy to find—initiates the analysis. In seconds, it returns an AI probability score. This quick feedback is crucial when I need immediate results without navigating through complex menus.
The browser extension is a game changer for me. Once installed, it appears as a small icon in my browser's toolbar. When I need to verify a webpage for AI-written content, a simple click on this icon does the trick. It automatically pulls the text from the current page and performs the check. This feature eliminates the need to manually copy and paste content into the main website, significantly speeding up my workflow.
For those managing large amounts of content, like myself, the API integration feature is invaluable. I've integrated Copyleaks directly into our content management systems, which allows my team to run checks right from our own platform, greatly simplifying the process. For educators, embedding this tool into a Learning Management System (LMS) means that students can submit assignments directly into the system that automatically checks for AI-generated content, ensuring academic integrity with minimal effort.
Copyleaks isn't just for detecting AI-generated text; it's also equipped with a strong plagiarism detection tool. Although it's slightly inconvenient that I can't run both AI and plagiarism checks at the same time, having both functionalities in a single platform is more efficient than juggling multiple tools. This dual capability allows me to ensure the authenticity of content from several angles, crucial for maintaining high standards of originality.
While the cost adds up, the peace of mind and the assurance of content integrity make these plans worthwhile investments.
At $16.99 per month, this plan gives me 100 credits, where one credit lets me check 250 words. It's a good deal because I can detect both AI-generated content and plagiarized material. This is especially handy since it works in multiple languages—over 100 for plagiarism and 30 for AI detection. It's useful for my projects that need multilingual support.
The ability to spot various paraphrasing styles is a key feature. This plan identifies direct and indirect paraphrasing and even picks up on text that's been altered by spinners. For me, this means fewer worries about the originality of the content I review.
It also recognizes popular AI models like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude. Given its claim of over 99% accuracy, I find it reliable for ensuring the content hasn't been generated by these AIs. As of now, it can identify many AI models, which is crucial for maintaining content integrity.
This plan allows two users, which suits small teams. Additional users can be added, but that costs extra. API access is included, which is perfect for integrating these checks into my existing workflows.
Priced at $10.99 monthly for up to 100 credits, this plan focuses solely on detecting plagiarism. It's effective for handling text in over 30 languages and can detect when someone has lifted code—quite a niche feature that's important for my tech-related content.
Paraphrasing detection is comprehensive here, catching all kinds of rewritten content. But the standout feature is its ability to check for originality in programming code across many languages like JAVA and Python. This is a major plus for me since it covers all the major programming languages I deal with.
Cross-language detection is another advantage. It allows me to check a document in one language against sources in another, which is incredibly useful in my multilingual projects.
Like the first plan, this also includes API access and allows adding more users for an extra fee.
At $9.99 per month, offering 100 credits, this plan is straightforward—it detects AI-generated content with a promised accuracy of over 99%. It supports a wide array of languages, which is essential for my international content needs.
This service's ability to detect content from major AI models like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude is its core feature. It ensures that the content I am working with or reviewing is genuinely human-created, which is increasingly important.
The plan includes basic multi-user support and API access, similar to the other plans, making it easy to scale up if necessary.
The closest thing to Copyleaks is the infamous assignment checker; Turnitin.
Based on my own experience + the fact that Turnitin is used by pretty much every school and university worldwide, It's safe to assume that Turnitin may be more reliable than Copyleaks when it comes to AI detection performance and accuracy.
Many people wonder about the reliability of Copyleaks as an AI detector. After using it 482 tests, I found it to be accurate 87% of the time. Its effectiveness can vary based on the content, the AI text generator used, and other factors.
You probably wouldn't be able to tell, but....
